<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profiling Ruby With Google&#8217;s Perftools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/</link>
	<description>A goal is a dream with a deadline.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Louth</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-208499</link>
		<dc:creator>William Louth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-208499</guid>
		<description>A solution for those using the JRuby VM.

http://williamlouth.wordpress.com/2009/08/05/the-fastest-ruby-profiler-is-a-java-profiler/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A solution for those using the JRuby VM.</p>
<p><a href="http://williamlouth.wordpress.com/2009/08/05/the-fastest-ruby-profiler-is-a-java-profiler/" rel="nofollow">http://williamlouth.wordpress.com/2009/08/05/the-fastest-ruby-profiler-is-a-java-profiler/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger rubygem docs</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-202508</link>
		<dc:creator>roger rubygem docs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-202508</guid>
		<description>It looks like sinatra would benefit from some way to do Time.new better
 [like maybe http://www.a-k-r.org/clockcount/index.html or hitimes somehow]

Rubygems could use a Dir.glob :just_directories =&gt; true method

merb could be run using thin--those IO#writes might be caused by mongrel [?]

all of them could use GC tweaking, so they spend less time there.

rails could use a faster logger [http://allgems.ruby-forum.com/gems?search=logger]

EM could use to call rb_clear_cache_by_class less [whatever causes that] and could use 1.9 for it's faster VM.

Wow this is totally sweet..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like sinatra would benefit from some way to do Time.new better<br />
 [like maybe <a href="http://www.a-k-r.org/clockcount/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.a-k-r.org/clockcount/index.html</a> or hitimes somehow]</p>
<p>Rubygems could use a Dir.glob :just_directories =&gt; true method</p>
<p>merb could be run using thin&#8211;those IO#writes might be caused by mongrel [?]</p>
<p>all of them could use GC tweaking, so they spend less time there.</p>
<p>rails could use a faster logger [http://allgems.ruby-forum.com/gems?search=logger]</p>
<p>EM could use to call rb_clear_cache_by_class less [whatever causes that] and could use 1.9 for it&#8217;s faster VM.</p>
<p>Wow this is totally sweet..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-200637</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-200637</guid>
		<description>there's also a date perf library out there wonder how it differs from third base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s also a date perf library out there wonder how it differs from third base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-200561</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-200561</guid>
		<description>I'd love to see this run with one of the libraries that speeds up Time performance like third base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see this run with one of the libraries that speeds up Time performance like third base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weerasak.com &#187; Article: Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-200203</link>
		<dc:creator>Weerasak.com &#187; Article: Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-200203</guid>
		<description>[...] Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools from igvita.com  Benchmarking, profiling and debugging are all areas where better tool support could really benefit the Ruby community. Built in benchmark library and extensions such as ruby-prof provide us with a minimal level of introspection to help identify the common bottlenecks, but they still fall short of the available tools for the JVM, or other dynamic runtimes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools from igvita.com  Benchmarking, profiling and debugging are all areas where better tool support could really benefit the Ruby community. Built in benchmark library and extensions such as ruby-prof provide us with a minimal level of introspection to help identify the common bottlenecks, but they still fall short of the available tools for the JVM, or other dynamic runtimes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Knut Hellan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-199789</link>
		<dc:creator>The Knut Hellan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-199789</guid>
		<description>[...] @ruby_news: Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools &#8211; I know I&#8217;ll be using this in the coming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] @ruby_news: Profiling Ruby With Google’s Perftools &#8211; I know I&#8217;ll be using this in the coming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generate Ruby Profiling Charts With Perftools &#124; Webs Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-199653</link>
		<dc:creator>Generate Ruby Profiling Charts With Perftools &#124; Webs Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-199653</guid>
		<description>[...] Grigorik has written an interesting article called Profiling Ruby with Google&#8217;s Perftools about using a port of Google&#8217;s Perftools (perftools.rb) to build graphs showing the results [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grigorik has written an interesting article called Profiling Ruby with Google&#8217;s Perftools about using a port of Google&#8217;s Perftools (perftools.rb) to build graphs showing the results [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Profiling Charts With Perftools</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-199648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby Profiling Charts With Perftools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-199648</guid>
		<description>[...] Grigorik has written an interesting article called Profiling Ruby with Google's Perftools about using a port of Google's Perftools (perftools.rb) to build graphs showing the results of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grigorik has written an interesting article called Profiling Ruby with Google&#8217;s Perftools about using a port of Google&#8217;s Perftools (perftools.rb) to build graphs showing the results of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Grigorik</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-199549</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Grigorik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-199549</guid>
		<description>@hgs: No callbacks. You can check the source even!

@nc: As far as I'm aware it won't work with 1.9 out of the box. Albeit that's a good feature request for Aman!

@cheapRoc: Great point. I have to admit that because I'm not a Mac user I tend to discount DTrace (since my forays into linux flavors of DTrace have all failed miserably). Definitely a great tool to keep in mind, especially if you have a Solaris box around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hgs: No callbacks. You can check the source even!</p>
<p>@nc: As far as I&#8217;m aware it won&#8217;t work with 1.9 out of the box. Albeit that&#8217;s a good feature request for Aman!</p>
<p>@cheapRoc: Great point. I have to admit that because I&#8217;m not a Mac user I tend to discount DTrace (since my forays into linux flavors of DTrace have all failed miserably). Definitely a great tool to keep in mind, especially if you have a Solaris box around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2009/06/13/profiling-ruby-with-googles-perftools/comment-page-1/#comment-199443</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/?p=501#comment-199443</guid>
		<description>Wow cool stuff.
There's also a few benchmarks using gprof of 1.9 at
http://github.com/hogelog/ruby-1.9.1-p0/tree/ee0f53e2559af9b564176f000ec4cd35e01ec06a/sample/_gprof_out
if anybody would find them interesting. [looking forward to a 1.9 compat. release here]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow cool stuff.<br />
There&#8217;s also a few benchmarks using gprof of 1.9 at<br />
<a href="http://github.com/hogelog/ruby-1.9.1-p0/tree/ee0f53e2559af9b564176f000ec4cd35e01ec06a/sample/_gprof_out" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/hogelog/ruby-1.9.1-p0/tree/ee0f53e2559af9b564176f000ec4cd35e01ec06a/sample/_gprof_out</a><br />
if anybody would find them interesting. [looking forward to a 1.9 compat. release here]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
