<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Load Balancing &#038; QoS with HAProxy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/</link>
	<description>A goal is a dream with a deadline.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Billie Blaze: Nginx Haproxy</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-151969</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie Blaze: Nginx Haproxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-151969</guid>
		<description>[...] Two colleagues pointed me towards various white papers and links which started this all. The first had wrote regarding eliminating Apache from his apache/tomcat stack and how that increased performance and decreased complexity. The second person (while not a Rails developer, yet totally all about Rails) put the Nginx and Memcached bug in my ear. Hmm.. How can I leverage all of this to my ability? After many nights of lost sleep and endless hours googling it, I came across this post by Ilya Grigorik: http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two colleagues pointed me towards various white papers and links which started this all. The first had wrote regarding eliminating Apache from his apache/tomcat stack and how that increased performance and decreased complexity. The second person (while not a Rails developer, yet totally all about Rails) put the Nginx and Memcached bug in my ear. Hmm.. How can I leverage all of this to my ability? After many nights of lost sleep and endless hours googling it, I came across this post by Ilya Grigorik: <a href="http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting stuff for 2008-08-09 &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-109699</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting stuff for 2008-08-09 &#171; Derivadow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-109699</guid>
		<description>[...] Load Balancing &#38; QoS with HAProxy [igvita.com] The worst thing you can do is queue up another request behind an already long running process. To mitigate the problem HAProxy goes beyond a simple round-robin scheduler, and implements a very handy feature: intelligent request queuing!     &#171; When&#8217;s the sailing on? Introducing genre&#160;schedules&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Load Balancing &amp; QoS with HAProxy [igvita.com] The worst thing you can do is queue up another request behind an already long running process. To mitigate the problem HAProxy goes beyond a simple round-robin scheduler, and implements a very handy feature: intelligent request queuing!     &laquo; When&#8217;s the sailing on? Introducing genre&nbsp;schedules&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Kenobi</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-106264</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kenobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-106264</guid>
		<description>I like the diagrams. Load balancing is a very misunderstood topic and there are not many posts about it on the net

I blog about high tech stuff like &lt;a href="http://www.loadbalancingswitches.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;layer 7 load balancing&lt;/a&gt;

cheers
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the diagrams. Load balancing is a very misunderstood topic and there are not many posts about it on the net</p>
<p>I blog about high tech stuff like <a href="http://www.loadbalancingswitches.com" rel="nofollow">layer 7 load balancing</a></p>
<p>cheers<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nginx + HAProxy + Thin + FastCGI + PHP5 = Load Balanced Rails with PHP Support at elwoodicious</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-106085</link>
		<dc:creator>nginx + HAProxy + Thin + FastCGI + PHP5 = Load Balanced Rails with PHP Support at elwoodicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-106085</guid>
		<description>[...] application servers with the primary and secondary status staggered between each nginx instance. Igvita&#8217;s post was the inspiration for this and our goal is to create a more fault tolerant environment built [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] application servers with the primary and secondary status staggered between each nginx instance. Igvita&#8217;s post was the inspiration for this and our goal is to create a more fault tolerant environment built [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Grigorik</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104545</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Grigorik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104545</guid>
		<description>Alexander, that's awesome! 

Everyone else, make sure you get the new HAProxy point release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexander, that&#8217;s awesome! </p>
<p>Everyone else, make sure you get the new HAProxy point release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Staubo</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104391</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Staubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104391</guid>
		<description>Nah, &lt;a href="http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;i&gt;here&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, <a href="http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/" rel="nofollow"><i>here</i></a> it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Staubo</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104390</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Staubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-104390</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's a followup&lt;/a&gt; benchmarking the new 1.3.15.2 patch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/another-comparison-of-haproxy-and-nginx/" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s a followup</a> benchmarking the new 1.3.15.2 patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Staubo</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103946</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Staubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103946</guid>
		<description>That's my blog that just pinged you. I have written &lt;a href="http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-haproxy-for-web-applications/" rel="nofollow"&gt;a bit about HAProxy performance here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my blog that just pinged you. I have written <a href="http://affectioncode.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/comparing-nginx-and-haproxy-for-web-applications/" rel="nofollow">a bit about HAProxy performance here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparing Nginx and HAProxy for web applications &#171; Affection Code</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103935</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparing Nginx and HAProxy for web applications &#171; Affection Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103935</guid>
		<description>[...] reading about HAProxy (there&#8217;s nice blog Rails-oriented blog post here), I felt the itch to try out this product myself. HAProxy has a handsome feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading about HAProxy (there&#8217;s nice blog Rails-oriented blog post here), I felt the itch to try out this product myself. HAProxy has a handsome feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Staubo</title>
		<link>http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103470</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Staubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.igvita.com/2008/05/13/load-balancing-qos-with-haproxy/#comment-103470</guid>
		<description>Your logic is oddly circular. :-) I'm suggesting that you use HAProxy in an optimal way to get the best performance. You're suggesting I use round-robin DNS if I want the best performance! That's reductio ad absurdum if anything.

Anyway, I agree. HAProxy is nice. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your logic is oddly circular. :-) I&#8217;m suggesting that you use HAProxy in an optimal way to get the best performance. You&#8217;re suggesting I use round-robin DNS if I want the best performance! That&#8217;s reductio ad absurdum if anything.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree. HAProxy is nice. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
