Comments on: Testing RDDB: RESTful Ruby Database http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/ A goal is a dream with a deadline. Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:32:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Web 2.0 with Ruby on Rails » RDDB: RESTful Ruby Document-Oriented Database http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-90297 Web 2.0 with Ruby on Rails » RDDB: RESTful Ruby Document-Oriented Database Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:06:04 +0000 http://www.igvita.com/blog/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-90297 [...] Igvita [...] [...] Igvita [...]

]]> By: Ilya Grigorik http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-90232 Ilya Grigorik Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:38:34 +0000 http://www.igvita.com/blog/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-90232 Toby, good points. Since I posted this overview Anthony has acknowledged the concurrency issues and also hinted at adding a memcached layer to take care of the raised problems. Adrian, interesting idea with Madeleine, but I don't think it will solve the underlying problem. In order for RDDB to go to the next 'level', the data persistence model needs to evolve to, at the very least, an incremental backup approach. Toby, good points. Since I posted this overview Anthony has acknowledged the concurrency issues and also hinted at adding a memcached layer to take care of the raised problems.

Adrian, interesting idea with Madeleine, but I don’t think it will solve the underlying problem. In order for RDDB to go to the next ‘level’, the data persistence model needs to evolve to, at the very least, an incremental backup approach.

]]> By: » The Links » roarin’ reporter http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87368 » The Links » roarin’ reporter Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:13:55 +0000 http://www.igvita.com/blog/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87368 [...] Testing RDDB: RESTful Ruby Database [...] [...] Testing RDDB: RESTful Ruby Database [...]

]]> By: Adrian Madrid http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87231 Adrian Madrid Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:48:40 +0000 http://www.igvita.com/blog/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87231 I was playing a bit with RDDB too and wondered if a Prevayler (Madeleine) store wouldn't be a great middle ground between RAM and File storage. AEM I was playing a bit with RDDB too and wondered if a Prevayler (Madeleine) store wouldn’t be a great middle ground between RAM and File storage.

AEM

]]> By: Toby DiPasquale http://www.igvita.com/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87113 Toby DiPasquale Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:11:31 +0000 http://www.igvita.com/blog/2007/11/15/testing-rddb-restful-ruby-database/#comment-87113 Some addendums to your article: * RDDB currently does not support concurrency in the S3 engine * it does not currently handle the fact that S3 writes do not appear for reading immediately after the write is complete * it will need to dump aws-s3 if it is serious about keeping S3 as a backend, as aws-s3 can't be used from multiple threads concurrently Some addendums to your article:

* RDDB currently does not support concurrency in the S3 engine
* it does not currently handle the fact that S3 writes do not appear for reading immediately after the write is complete
* it will need to dump aws-s3 if it is serious about keeping S3 as a backend, as aws-s3 can’t be used from multiple threads concurrently

]]>